The Ford Pinto case is a well
–
known case that is often discussed in the context of business ethics. To summarize, Ford’s
design of the Pinto’s fuel tank was defective, causing fires if the Pinto was
involved in even minor rear
–
end collisions. Ford
came to learn of the defect, but
the company
failed to correct it
; Ford then
predict
ed
, based on a cost
–
benefit analysis, that
it would cost more to repair the defect ($11 per vehicle, or $137 million total)
than it would
to
pay
for
damages
resulting
from
burn deaths, burn injuries, and burned vehicles ($47.5 million). Consider the Ford Pinto case in light of the who
–
how
(WH) framework for business ethics.
Would Ford’s decision to forego repairing the defec
tive design comply with these ethical guidelines? If so, why? If not,
then what actions should Ford have taken to satisfy them? Explain your reasoning.
Your response to this question should be a minimum of 500 words. Cite any direct quotes or paraphrased
material from
outside sources. Use APA format.
Information about accessing the grading rubric for this assignment is provided below.
