
ASSIGNMENT 3

POSITION PAPER: POWER, POLITICS,
AND CULTURE
Due
Week 8, worth 250 points
Power and politics greatly
influence an organization’s culture. In business, the culture can make or break
an organization’s productivity. In this assignment, you’ll analyze the ways
power and politics have influenced an organization’s culture. You’ll apply best
practices you learned in course resources and your own research to make
recommendations for improving this organization’s culture.
PREPARATION
Using the same organization from
the first two assignments, imagine the CEO has now requested your task force
investigate the influence of power and politics on the corporate culture. You
have been asked to prepare a position paper that presents and supports your
recommendations to improve the culture.
Prepare for this assignment by
delving into the organization’s culture and identi-fying the resources you, the
task force leader, will use to create your research-supported position paper.
Use at least two quality resources such as the course textbook, company
website, business websites (CNBC, Bloomberg, etc.), resources from the Strayer
Library, and/or outside sources.
Note:
Wikipedia and web-based blogs do
not qualify as credible resources.
INSTRUCTIONS
Develop
your position paper, addressing the following components:
1. Influence of Politics and Power
Explain how politics and
power-play may have influenced the organization’s culture.
2. Sources of Power
Explore the sources of power and
describe how management could use this influence to benefit your department and
improve organizational performance.
3. Leadership Behavior and Culture
Make recommendations that support
how the study of power and politics could influence leadership behavior and
improve the organization’s culture.
4. Leadership Influence
Discuss the importance and
complexity of leadership behavior. How does it influence organizational
structure and performance?
5. Executive Summary
Prepare an executive summary that
presents your recommendations for ways in which the organization could build a
stronger culture. Note:An executive summary is a condensed version of
your fullreport. It should summarize briefly all the main points in concise
paragraphs. It should be written clearly and should use language appropriate
for the audience.
PROFESSIONAL
AND APA FORMATTING REQUIREMENTS
Your
assignment must follow these general APA formatting requirements:
Be typed (five to seven pages recommended,
excluding cover and reference pages), double-spaced, using Times New Roman font
(size 12) with one-inch margins on all sides
Include a References List
Include a cover page containing the title of
the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and
the date
Include in-text citations following APA style,
using attributive tags and signal verbs
Cite at least two credible sources
POINTS:
250

Criteria

1.
Influence
of Politics and Power
Weight:
20%
ASSIGNMENT 3: POSITION PAPER: POWER,
POLITICS, AND CULTURE

|
Unacceptable |
Fair |
Proficient |
Exemplary |
|||
|
Below |
70-79% |
80-89% |
90-100% |
|||
|
Does |
Partially |
Satisfactorily |
Completely |
|||
|
explain |
explains |
explains |
explains |
|||
|
politics |
politics |
politics |
politics |
|||
|
power-play |
power-play |
power-play |
power-play |
|||
|
may |
have |
have |
have |
|||
|
influenced |
the |
the |
the |
|||
|
organization’s |
tion’s |
tion’s |
tion’s |
|||
|
culture. |
Identifies |
Identifies |
Accurately |
|||
|
issues |
core |
identifies |
||||
|
does |
connects |
core |
||||
|
explore |
to |
strongly |
||||
|
make |
on |
nects |
||||
|
connection |
The |
the |
||||
|
their |
tion |
culture. |
||||
|
Uses |
research |
explanation |
||||
|
research |
support |
well-supported |
||||
|
support. |
by |
|||||
|
2. |
Does |
Partially |
Satisfactorily |
Completely |
||||
|
Power |
fy |
fies |
identifies |
identifies |
||||
|
of |
es |
sources |
sources |
|||||
|
Weight: |
describe |
and |
power |
power |
||||
|
management |
how |
describes |
describes |
|||||
|
could |
ment |
management |
management |
|||||
|
influence |
this |
could |
could |
|||||
|
enhance |
to |
influence |
influence |
|||||
|
zational |
organizational |
enhance |
enhance |
|||||
|
mance. |
performance. |
zational |
zational |
|||||
|
no |
Not |
mance. |
mance. |
|||||
|
research |
concepts |
key |
relevant |
|||||
|
identified |
are |
concepts |
||||||
|
there |
identified |
makes |
||||||
|
connection |
there |
connections |
||||||
|
performance. |
nection |
enhanced |
||||||
|
There |
enhanced |
performance |
||||||
|
research |
formance |
that |
||||||
|
support. |
research |
well-supported |
||||||
|
support. |
by |
|||||||
|
3. |
Does |
Partially |
Satisfactorily |
Provides |
||||
|
Behavior |
fy |
mends |
identifies |
lent |
||||
|
Culture |
of |
study |
sources |
dations |
||||
|
describe |
and |
power |
how |
|||||
|
Weight: |
management |
could |
describes |
power |
||||
|
could |
leadership |
management |
tics |
|||||
|
influence |
behavior |
could |
ence |
|||||
|
enhance |
impact |
influence |
behavior |
|||||
|
zational |
organization’s |
enhance |
impact |
|||||
|
mance. |
culture, |
zational |
nization’s |
|||||
|
no |
recommenda- |
mance. |
culture. |
|||||
|
research |
tions |
key |
mendations |
|||||
|
or |
are |
credible |
||||||
|
There |
identified |
relevant |
||||||
|
connection |
there |
strong |
||||||
|
the |
nection |
tion |
||||||
|
culture. |
enhanced |
impact |
||||||
|
little |
formance |
culture |
||||||
|
research |
research |
by |
||||||
|
support. |
support. |
ed |
||||||
|
4. |
Does |
Partially |
Satisfactorily |
Provides |
||||
|
Influence |
recommend |
mends |
recommends |
lent |
||||
|
how |
study |
how |
dations |
|||||
|
Weight: |
of |
and |
of |
how |
||||
|
politics |
could |
politics |
of |
|||||
|
influence |
leadership |
influence |
politics |
|||||
|
ership |
behavior |
ership |
influence |
|||||
|
and |
impact |
and |
ership |
|||||
|
organization’s |
organization’s |
organization’s |
and |
|||||
|
culture. |
culture, |
culture. |
organization’s |
|||||
|
no |
recommenda- |
mendations |
culture. |
|||||
|
research. |
tions |
clear |
mendations |
|||||
|
unclear |
mostly |
credible |
||||||
|
unrealistic. |
there |
relevant |
||||||
|
There |
nection |
strong |
||||||
|
clear |
impact |
tion |
||||||
|
tion |
culture. |
impact |
||||||
|
impact |
Research |
culture |
||||||
|
culture. |
port |
backed |
||||||
|
is |
well-supported |
|||||||
|
research |
research. |
|||||||
|
support. |
||||||||
|
5. |
Does |
Partially |
Satisfactorily |
Thoroughly |
||||
|
Summary |
discuss |
discusses |
discusses |
discusses |
||||
|
importance |
the |
the |
the |
|||||
|
Weight: |
complexity |
and |
and |
and |
||||
|
leadership |
of |
of |
of |
|||||
|
behavior |
behavior |
behavior |
behavior |
|||||
|
influences |
ences |
influences |
influences |
|||||
|
organizational |
tional |
organizational |
organizational |
|||||
|
structure |
and |
structure |
structure |
|||||
|
performance. |
mance. |
performance. |
performance. |
|||||
|
There |
key |
Most |
Relevant |
|||||
|
reference |
are |
cepts |
concepts |
|||||
|
research. |
and |
sented |
presented |
|||||
|
little |
research |
strong |
||||||
|
research |
support. |
support. |
||||||
|
support. |
||||||||
|
6. |
Writing |
Writing |
Writing |
Writing |
||||||
|
Professionally |
meet |
factory. |
be |
lent. |
||||||
|
Using |
standards. |
sional |
but |
professional |
||||||
|
Resources |
is |
developing. |
acceptable |
and |
||||||
|
sional. |
Shows |
standards. |
ed. |
|||||||
|
Weight: |
nication |
ate |
is |
clarity, |
||||||
|
wholly |
ty, |
Shows |
consistent |
|||||||
|
in |
sistent |
clarity, |
formatting. |
|||||||
|
and/or |
ting. |
consistent |
Contains |
|||||||
|
tent |
tain |
formatting. |
spelling, |
|||||||
|
Contains |
a |
contain |
mechanical, |
|||||||
|
spelling, |
grammar, |
no |
grammatical |
|||||||
|
mechanical, |
mechanical, |
mechanical, |
errors. |
|||||||
|
formatting, |
formatting, |
and/or |
formatting |
|||||||
|
citation, |
citation |
matical |
citation |
|||||||
|
gr
Categories:
|
