General Guidelines for the Risk Management Paper
All written projects should conform to standards of formatting and documentation, including proper citations
and references found in an acceptable college-level writing guide such as APA, or ‘s Guide toWriting
and Research.
Written projects must be:
1. typed, double-spaced, in 12-point Times New Roman font, with margins no wider than one inch 2. have correct citations 3. have a bibliography of sources used 4. include, for each entry, the author, title, city and state of publisher, publisher’s name, year, and page
numbers Case Study on Risk Management Tools (4–7 pages)
Evaluate the risk management techniques used by your employer, including employee
benefit and physical location risk management. If you are not employed, please contact
the instructor to determine an appropriate alternative. Written Paper Rubric
Criteria Organizat
ion Possible Points per Criteria
Exemplary Meets
Expectations Developing Poor Not
Apparent Arranges
ideas clearly
and logically
to support
the purpose
or argument;
ideas flow
smoothly
and are
effectively
linked;
reader can
follow the
line of
reasoning Arranges
ideas
adequately to
support the
purpose or
argument;
links between
ideas are
generally
clear; reader
can follow the
line of
reasoning for
the most part Arranges
ideas
adequately,
in general,
although
ideas
sometimes
fail to make
sense
together;
reader
remains
fairly clear
about what
writer
intends Arranges
ideas
illogically;
ideas
frequently
fail to make
sense
together;
reader
cannot
identify a
line of
reasoning
and
becomes
frustrated or No
assignme
nt
submitte
d or
submitte
d late loses
interest
Content Gives very
specific
information.
Addressed all
of the
assignment
components.
Clearly
illustrates
critical and
reflective
thinking.
Well thought
out
response. Contains
specific
information.
Addressed all
of the
assignment
components.
Is relatively
detailed.
Shows some
critical and
reflective
thinking.
Relatively
well thought
out response. Has some
specific
information.
Addressed
many of the
assignment
components.
Not detailed.
Poorly
thought out
response. Is vague and
does not
address all
assignment
components.
No evidence
of having
given the
assignment
real thought. No
assignme
nt
submitte
d or
submitte
d late. Technical
/
Grammar Execution is
excellent. No
grammar or
writing
errors. Reads
easily. Is well
organized. Well
executed.
Few grammar
or writing
errors. Reads
easily.
Is fairly well
organized. Execution is
poor. Many
grammar or
writing
errors. Hard
to read.
Poorly
organized. Falls short of
the required
length for
the
assignment.
Very poorly
written. Very
difficult to
read. No
organization
is evident.
Reads like a
last minute
effort. No
assignme
nt
submitte
d or
submitte
d late
