Sanders v. American Broadcasting Cos. Supreme Court of California, 20 CAL 4th 907 (1999)
- Identify the “intrusion on seclusion” in the case.
- Was the court of appeal correct in setting aside the jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff because there must be a complete expectation of privacy to recover for intrusion and other employees could hear the conversation in question?
- How does the court deal with ABC’s argument that an adverse decision would have a chilling effect on the press’s investigation of abusive activities in open work areas?
Categories: