Details:
Complete “Resource: Rancho Solano Case Peer Evaluation.” Grades will be prorated based on the evaluation.
You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.
Resource:Peer Evaluation
Complete this peer evaluation for each
member of your team, including yourself. The average score from these
evaluations will be used in determining your final grade for the assignment.
Rate each team member on a scale of 1 to 100,
with 100 being the highest. Use the rubric on the second page to determine the
score for each team member. Include comments explaining why you gave your
teammate this score.
Your peer evaluations will be kept strictly
confidential. Your grade for the evaluation will be posted in the gradebook
as an assignment, but individual ratings will not be shared.
|
Group member:
List names
|
Rating:
1 –100
|
Comments:
Must be completed for each
team member
|
|
1. Your name
|
|
|
|
2.
|
|
|
|
3.
|
|
|
|
4.
|
|
|
|
5.
|
|
|
|
6.
|
|
|
|
CATEGORY
|
100-93 pts (A)
Excellent
|
92-83 pts (B) Good
|
82-73 pts (C)
Improving
|
72-0 pts (D) Needs
Improvement
|
|
Contributions
|
Routinely provides
useful ideas when participating in the group discussion. Contributes a lot of
effort.
|
Usually provides
useful ideas when participating in the group discussion. A good group member
who tries hard.
|
Sometimes provides
useful ideas when participating in the group discussion. A satisfactory group
member who does what is required.
|
Rarely provides
useful ideas when participating in the group discussion. May refuse to
participate.
|
|
Quality of Work
|
No
correction or revision necessary, work is complete and of high quality.
|
Revisions
and corrections may not be necessary and work is adequate for what is needed.
|
Some
revision and/or correction is needed or work is not always completed in the
manner required.
|
Work
provided constantly needs correction and revision and is often incomplete.
|
|
Time-management
|
All work
is turned in on time or even earlier than necessary, the team member is
reliable for posting/submitting whole pieces that the group has put together
and responsibilities never need to be reassigned to compensate.
|
Work is,
for the most part, on time and, on a few occasions, early. For the most part,
the team member is reliable for submitting completed team documents. Group
member does not need to be compensated for.
|
Occasionally
the work is on time. Rarely is it early. On one or two occasions did the rest
of the group need to compensate for missing or late work.
|
Occasionally
the work is on time and is never early. Team member cannot be relied on to
turn in team documents and other members sometimes must compensate for
tardiness of work assigned.
|
|
Attitude
|
Always
has a positive attitude about the project and works well with the other team
members. Any criticism given is constructive.
|
Usually
has a positive attitude toward the work and group, but conflict is usually
minor. Any criticism is often constructive.
|
Attitude
is hit or miss toward project and group, but member is for the most part
tolerable. Criticism given is, on occasion, constructive, if given at all.
|
Rarely
has a positive attitude; participation,quality of work, and time management
is severely affected by such; and team member has difficulties and conflict
with group.
|
After the total for each
student has been added together, and divided by the number of team members
rating him/her; calculate the following: ___/100 x 2% =____ out of 2points for
this evaluation.
