DeVry
MGMT520 week 1 Discussion 1 & 2 latest 2016 november
dq 1
Ethics and Social Responsibility of Business
(graded)
Watch the video case study (link below) and
discuss the case emphasizing the connections between business, law, politics,
and ethics.
Video Case Study: Ethics and Social
Responsibility of Business – Whistle-Blower on the NSH
dq 2
|
International Code of Ethics (graded) |
Read and discuss the Marianne Jennings
Article: “Why an International Code of Ethics Would Be Good.”
- Download
article located in Doc Sharing.
DeVry
MGMT520 week 2 Discussion 1 & 2 latest 2016 november
dq 1
|
Constitutional Law for Business and |
Please discuss Constitutional Law for Business
and E-Commerce emphasizing the connections between business, law, politics and
ethics. What is the Supremacy Clause and how does it function?
dq 2
|
Administrative Law and Regulatory |
Please discuss Administrative Law and
Regulatory Agencies emphasizing the connections between business, law, politics
and ethics. How are Administrative Agencies created?
DeVry
MGMT520 week 3 Discussion 1 & 2 latest 2016 november
dq 1
Intentional Torts and Negligence (graded)
Watch the video case study (link below) and
discuss the case emphasizing the connections between business, law, politics,
and ethics.
Video Case Study: Intentional Torts and
Negligence
dq 2
Strict Liability and Product Liability (graded)
Watch the video case study (link below) and
discuss the case emphasizing the connections between business, law, politics,
and ethics.
Video Case Study: Strict Liability and Product
Liability
DeVry
MGMT520 week 4 Discussion 1 & 2 latest 2016 november
dq 1
Nature of Traditional and E-Contracts (graded)
Watch the video case study (link below) and
discuss the case emphasizing the connections between business, law, politics,
and ethics.
Video Case Study: Nature of Traditional and
E-Contracts
dq 2
Intellectual Property and Cyber Piracy
(graded)
Watch the video case study (link below) and
discuss the case emphasizing the connections between business, law, politics,
and ethics.
Video Case Study: Intellectual Property and
Cyber Piracy
DeVry
MGMT520 week 5 Discussion 1 & 2 latest 2016 november
dq 1
Employment, Worker Protection, and Immigration
Law (graded)
Watch the video case study (link below) and
discuss the case emphasizing the connections between business, law, politics,
and ethics.
Video Case Study: Employment, Worker
Protection, and Immigration Law
dq 2
Labor Law and Collective Bargaining
(graded)
Watch the video case study (link
below) and discuss the case emphasizing the connections between business, law,
politics, and ethics.
Video Case Study: Labor Law and
Collective Bargaining
DeVry
MGMT520 week 6 Discussion 1 & 2 latest 2016 november
dq 1
|
Credit, Mortgages, and Debtor’s |
Please discuss Credit, Mortgages, and Debtor’s
Rights emphasizing the connections between business, law, politics and ethics.
What rights do Debtors and Creditors have under the law?
dq 2
Warranties (graded)
Watch the video case study (link below) and
discuss the case emphasizing the connections between business, law, politics,
and ethics.
Video Case Study: Warranties
DeVry
MGMT520 week 7 Discussion 1 & 2 latest 2016 november
dq 1
Corporate Acquisitions and Multinational
Corporations (graded)
Watch the video case study (link below) and
discuss the case emphasizing the connections between business, law, politics,
and ethics.
Video Case Study: Corporate Acquisitions and
Multinational Corporations
dq 2
Banks, E-Money, and Financial Reform (graded)
Watch the video case study (link below) and
discuss the case emphasizing the connections between business, law, politics,
and ethics.
Video Case Study: Banks, E-Money, and
Financial Reform
DeVry
MGMT520 week 1 Video case study latest 2016 november
Week 1: Assignment
In each week the learning assignment is
designed to demonstrate your competence with the Terminal Course Objectives of
the course. Prior to working on the assignment, you should read through the
week’s chapters and lecture.
Clearly identify your work with your name, the
date, the week number and the assignmentname, and upload work to the Dropbox.
The questions are designed to probe the higher
levels of thinking and learning such as analyzing, evaluating and creating, and
so there often are no correct answers. Instead of focusing and who wins or
loses the case, you should analyze, evaluate, and create alternative solutions
to the various issues presented while arguingand debating the connections
between business, law, politics, and ethics.
Terminal Course Objective: A
Video Case Study: Court Systems and
Jurisdiction—Supreme Court Sides WithWalmart
http://media.pearsoncmg.com/ph/streaming/bp/2013/business_law/BLaw2013_Court_Sys.html
Watch the video case study and then write a
one- to two-page reflective paper (double spaced) on the following questions
while discussing the connections between business, law, politics, and ethics.
1. This story is about the Supreme Court’s
decision. What process did this case have to go through to get to the Supreme
Court?
2. In the story, two justices wrote differing
opinions about the issue. Discuss the differences between a majority opinion, a
concurring opinion, and a dissenting opinion. What effect does each type of
opinion have on the state of the law in America?
3.What type of jurisdiction did the federal
courts have in this case? Was it a federal question case or a diversity of
citizenship case? Why?
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc.
Submit your assignment to the Dropbox.
DeVry
MGMT520 week 2 case study latest 2016 november
Week2:
Assignment
In each week the learning assignment is
designed to demonstrate your competence with the Terminal Course Objectives of
the course. Prior to working on the assignment, you should read through the
week’s chapters and lecture.
Clearly identify your work with your name, the
date, the week number and the assignment name, and upload work to the Dropbox.
The questions are designed to probe the higher
levels of thinking and learning such as analyzing, evaluating and creating, and
so there often are no “correct” answers. Instead of focusing and who wins or
loses the case, you should analyze, evaluate and create alternative solutions
to the various issues presented while arguing and debating the connections
between business, law, politics and ethics.
Terminal
Course Objective: G
Based
on your reading, write a 1-2 page reflective paper (double spaced) on the
following questions while discussing the connections between business, law,
politics and ethics.
One:There has been a movement in the last decade encouraging people
to “buy American.” Discuss the legal and ethical issues related to boycotting
goods from other countries. What are the practical business implications of
such a move?
Two:The World Trade Organization, or WTO, is the largest and most
influential of the trade organizations. China and other heavy counterfeiting
nations are part of this group. What could WTO-participating nations do to
address the problems of counterfeiting? What should they do?
Three:The United Nations Security Council, the main decision-making
body at the UN, is comprised of five regular members: China, France, the
Russian Federation, the United Kingdom and the United States. Ten more members
are elected from the General Assembly. Given the make-up of the committee, what
type of action might the UN take with regard to the counterfeiting issue?
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc.
Submit your assignmentto the Dropbox.
DeVry
MGMT520 week 3 Video Case Study latest 2016 november
Week
3: Assignment
In
each week, the learning assignment is designed to demonstrate your competence
with the Terminal Course Objectives of the course. Prior to working on the
assignment, you should read through the week’s chapters and lecture.
Clearly
identify your work with your name, the date, the week number and the assignment
name, and upload work to the Dropbox.
The
questions are designed to probe the higher levels of thinking and learning,
such as analyzing, evaluating, and creating, and so there often are no correct
answers. Instead of focusing and who wins or loses the case, you should
analyze, evaluate, and create alternative solutions to the various issues
presented while arguing and debating the connections between business, law,
politics, and ethics.
Terminal
Course Objective: E
Video
Case Study: Environmental Protection—Environmental Victory
http://media.pearsoncmg.com/ph/streaming/bp/2013/business_law/BLaw2013_Env_Prot.html
Watch
the video case study and then write a one- to two-page reflective paper (double
spaced) on the following questions while discussing the connections between
business, law, politics, and ethics.
1.
The idea of global warming has not been universally accepted. Discuss how the
law must balance competing scientific opinions and make decisions in light of
uncertainty. How should this be done?
2.
Discuss the different stakeholders who have concern in this situation. What are
their interests, and which stakeholder should have the priority position?
3.
Environmental law is both federal and state-controlled. Discuss the effect on
state regulations if the federal government, through the Environmental
Protection Agency, changes the standards for air pollution and carbon dioxide
emissions.
Copyright
© 2013 Pearson Education, Inc.
Submit
your assignmentto the Dropbox.
DeVry MGMT520
Week 4 Midterm latest 2016 november
The idea of global warming has not been universally accepted.
Discuss how the law must balance competing scientific opinions and make
decisions in light of uncertainty. How should this be done?
Discuss the different stakeholders who have concern in this
situation. What are their interests, and which stakeholder should have the
priority position?
Environmental law is both federal and state-controlled. Discuss
the effect on state regulations if the federal government, through the
Environmental Protection Agency, changes the standards for air pollution and
carbon dioxide emissions.
DeVry
MGMT520 week 5 Video case study latest 2016 november
Week
5: Assignment
In
each week the learning assignment is designed to demonstrate your competence
with the Terminal Course Objectives of the course. Prior to working on the
assignment, you should read through the week’s chapters and lesson.
Clearly
identify your work with your name, the date, the week number, and the
assignment name, and upload work to the Dropbox.
The
questions are designed to probe the higher levels of thinking and learning such
as analyzing, evaluating, and creating, and so there often are no correct
answers. Instead of focusing and who wins or loses the case, you should
analyze, evaluate and create alternative solutions to the various issues
presented while arguing and debating the connections between business, law,
politics and ethics.
Terminal
Course Objective: D
Video
Case Study: Equal Opportunity in Employment—Isiah Thomas
http://media.pearsoncmg.com/ph/streaming/bp/2013/business_law/BLaw2013_Equal_Opp.html
Watch
the video case study and then write a one- to two-page reflective paper (double
spaced) on the following questions while discussing the connections between
business, law, politics, and ethics.
1.
Discuss whether there should be a different standard of behavior in the
workplace compared to personal relationships.
2.
According to the video, Isiah Thomas put his arm around the victim, tried to
kiss her on the cheek, called her sexually charged names, and made her feel
uncomfortable on the job. Discuss how a court should determine what constitutes
sexual harassment and what does not. Should culture play any part in that
determination?
3.
As part of this case, Madison Square Garden had to pay the victim because of
retaliation – she was fired for reporting the sexual harassment. In this case,
the jury determined sexual harassment occurred, that she complained to the
appropriate parties, and was fired for that. Given the dollar amounts discussed
in the video, discuss the risk that false sexual harassment claims might be
filed and what might be done to prevent that.
Copyright
© 2013 Pearson Education, Inc.
Submit
your assignmentto the Dropbox.
DeVry
MGMT520 week 6 Video case study latest 2016 november
Week6: Assignment
In each week, the learning assignment is designed to demonstrate
your competence with the Terminal Course Objectives of the course. Prior to
working on the assignment, you should read through the week’s chapters and
lecture.
Clearly identify your work with your name, the date, the week
number, and the assignment name, and upload work to the Dropbox.
The questions are designed to probe the higher levels of
thinking and learning such as analyzing, evaluating and creating, and so there
often are no correct answers. Instead of focusing and who wins or loses the
case, you should analyze, evaluate and create alternative solutions to the
various issues presented while arguing and debating the connections between
business, law, politics and ethics.
Terminal Course Objective: F, G
Video Case Study: Consumer Protection and Product Safety—Vitamin
Water Advertising Claims
http://media.pearsoncmg.com/ph/streaming/bp/2013/business_law/BLaw2013_Cons_Prot.html
Watch the video case study and then write a one- to two-page reflective
paper (double spaced) on the following questions while discussing the
connections between business, law, politics and ethics.
1. According to the video, Coca Cola advertises that Vitamin
Water will give people protection similar to exercise or flu shots. Discuss
whether this is deceptive advertising or mere promotion.
2. Vitamin Water responds to the claim by stating that the
ingredients are clearly on the label. Discuss whether manufacturers have any
duty to warn the public about their products or whether the law should adopt
the idea of “buyer beware” so that consumers read the labels.
3. Near the end of the video clip, the health and medical editor
states that washing hands and drinking water will keep one healthier than most
of the health products on the market. Should Congress or the states be more
assertive about regulating products based on health issues or is that too much
like big brother watching?
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc.
Submit your assignmentto the Dropbox.
DeVry
MGMT520 week 7 Video case study latest 2016 november
Week7: Assignment
In each week, the learning assignment is
designed to demonstrate your competence with the Terminal Course Objectives of
the course. Prior to working on the assignment, you should read the week’s
chapters and lecture.
Clearly identify your work with your name, the
date, the week number, and the assignment name, and upload your work to the
Dropbox.
The questions are designed to probe the higher
levels of thinking and learning such as analyzing, evaluating, and creating,
and so there often are no correct answers. Instead of focusing and who wins or
loses the case, you should analyze, evaluate, and create alternative solutions
to the various issues presented while arguing and debating the connections
between business, law, politics, and ethics.
Terminal Course Objectives: A and G
Video Case Study: Judicial, Alternative, and
E-Dispute Resolution – Arbitrators Favoring Creditors
http://media.pearsoncmg.com/ph/streaming/bp/2013/business_law/BLaw2013_Jud_Alt.html
Watch the video case study and then write a
one- to two-page reflective paper (double-spaced) on the following questions
while discussing the connections between business, law, politics, and ethics.
One: What is the difference between
arbitration and litigation? What steps in the litigation process are missing in
arbitration?
Two: If the parties to arbitration instead
went to court, discuss the steps that the parties would have to take in order
to go to trial.
Three: The story talked about repeat
players—companies that end up in arbitration repeatedly over time. Because
arbitrators are selected by a negotiation between the two parties in the
arbitration, this story indicates they are more likely to find for these repeat
players. Discuss the ethics of this conflict of interest and what might be done
to overcome the problem.
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc.
Submit your assignment to the Dropbox.
