Case: Should Kroger pay now for what a Ralphs’ employee did in the past?
-Assuming that the store and district managers of Ralphs received complaints about Misiolek’s behavior starting in 1985, but that these complaints did not reach Ralphs’ headquarters in Compton, do you believe that the judge is right in holding that the company as a whole should not be held responsible for his actions? Should the company be held responsible for policies that prevent complaints from reaching headquarters?
-What can a company do to make sure that a situation like Misiolek’s does not occur? why do you think Ralphs allowed Misiolek to continue managing stores?
(Must be cited and completed using APA 6th edition format)
Categories: