Think of a situation where a leadership team encountered a situation where things did not go well and they were faced with an ethical dilemma. Analyze what could have happened had they applied the appropriate decisions. Offer your solutions using an ethical framework.
Doa 4page analysis (excluding coverpage and References section) of the ethical situation. Your analysis must include the following:
· A brief (1 paragraphs) explanation of the ethical dilemma
· An explanation of the ethical framework that, if applied by the organization to make its decision, would have resolved the ethical dilemma, including support for your analysis from scholarly research
· An examination of both the positive and negative consequences of the decision, including the trade-offs that the leadership of the organization made in making their decision
· In APAformat
use 3 scholar reference
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout. Name: DDBA_8151_Week_6_Assignment_Rubric Grid View Element 1:
Ethical
Dilemma Exit List View
Superior
Criteria Excellent
Criteria Satisfactory
Criteria Marginal
Criteria Unsatisfactory
Criteria Not
Submitted 20 (20%) 19 (19%) 17 (17%) 15 (15%) 10 (10%) 0 (0%) Student
presents a
thorough and
detailed
analysis that
provides an
explanation of
the ethical
dilemma.
Several
sources and
examples
support
thinking. Student
presents a
thorough and
detailed
analysis that
provides an
explanation of
the ethical
dilemma.
Several
sources and
examples
support
thinking.
There are one
or two minor
errors in
analysis. Student
presents an
analysis with
some details
of the ethical
dilemma.
Some sources
and examples
support
thinking. Student
presents a
cursory or
incomplete
analysis with
vague or
missing
details of the
ethical
dilemma. Few
sources or
examples
support
thinking. Does not meet
minimal
standards. Did not
submit
element. https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16286201_1&rubric_id=_131946_1 1/4 8/12/2017 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn Superior
Criteria Excellent
Criteria Satisfactory
Criteria Marginal
Criteria Unsatisfactory
Criteria Not
Submitted Element 2:
Ethical
Framework 20 (20%) 19 (19%) 17 (17%) 15 (15%) 10 (10%) 0 (0%) Student
presents a
thorough and
detailed
analysis that
explains the
ethical
framework
that, if applied
by the
organization
to make its
decision,
would have
resolved the
ethical
dilemma, and
includes
support for
his/her
analysis from
scholarly
research.
Several
sources and
examples
support
thinking. Student
presents a
thorough and
detailed
analysis that
explains the
ethical
framework
that, if applied
by the
organization
to make its
decision,
would have
resolved the
ethical
dilemma, and
includes
support for
his/her
analysis from
scholarly
research.
Several
sources and
examples
support
thinking.
There are one
or two minor
errors in
analysis. Student
presents an
analysis with
some details
that explains
the ethical
framework
that, if applied
by the
organization
to make its
decision,
would have
resolved the
ethical
dilemma, and
includes some
support for
his/her
analysis from
scholarly
research.
Some sources
and examples
support
thinking. Student
presents a
cursory or
incomplete
analysis with
vague or
missing
details of the
ethical
framework
that, if applied
by the
organization
to make its
decision,
would have
resolved the
ethical
dilemma,
and/or does
not include
support for
his/her
analysis from
scholarly
research. Few
sources or
examples
support
thinking. Does not meet
minimal
standards. Did not
submit
element. Element 3:
Positive and
Negative
Consequences
of Decision 20 (20%) 19 (19%) 17 (17%) 15 (15%) 10 (10%) 0 (0%) Student
presents a
thorough and
detailed
analysis
examining
both the
positive and
negative
consequences
of the
decision,
including the
tradeoffs that
the leadership
of the
organization
made in
making their
decision.
Several
sources and
examples
support
thinking. Student
presents a
thorough and
detailed
analysis
examining
both the
positive and
negative
consequences
of the
decision,
including the
tradeoffs that
the leadership
of the
organization
made in
making their
decision.
Several
sources and
examples
support
thinking.
There are one
or two minor
errors in
analysis. Student
presents an
analysis with
some details
examining
both the
positive and
negative
consequences
of the
decision,
including
some of the
tradeoffs that
the leadership
of the
organization
made in
making their
decision.
Some sources
and examples
support
thinking. Student
presents a
cursory or
incomplete
analysis with
vague or
missing
details
examining
both the
positive and
negative
consequences
of the
decision,
and/or
provides
vague or
missing
details of the
tradeoffs that
the leadership
of the
organization
made in
making their
decision. Does not meet
minimal
standards. Did not
submit
element. https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16286201_1&rubric_id=_131946_1 2/4 8/12/2017 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn Superior
Criteria Excellent
Criteria Satisfactory
Criteria Marginal
Criteria Unsatisfactory
Criteria Not
Submitted Element 4:
Critical
Thinking 20 (20%) 19 (19%) 17 (17%) 15 (15%) 10 (10%) 0 (0%) Writing
exhibits
excellent
evidence of
thoughtful
critical
analysis and
thinking;
careful
examination is
made of
assumptions
and possible
biases, with
detailed
supporting
rationale.
Writing
synthesizes
the classroom
experiences
and content;
analyze
patterns or
connections
between
theory and
practice; and
draws logical
conclusions
based on wellreasoned,
superb
arguments. Writing
exhibits
excellent
evidence of
thoughtful
critical
analysis and
thinking;
careful
examination is
made of
assumptions
and possible
biases, with
detailed
supporting
rationale.
Writing
synthesizes
the classroom
experiences
and content;
analyze
patterns or
connections
between
theory and
practice; and
draws logical
conclusions
based on wellreasoned,
superb
arguments.
There are one
or two minor
errors in
explanation. Writing
exhibits some
evidence of
thoughtful
critical
analysis and
thinking. A
good
examination is
made of
assumptions
and possible
biases, with
some
supporting
rationale.
Writing
synthesizes
the classroom
experiences
and content;
analyzes
patterns or
connections
between
theory and
practice; and
draws logical
conclusions
based on wellreasoned
arguments
adequately,
but not
superbly. Writing
exhibits little
evidence of
thoughtful
critical
analysis and
thinking.
Examination
is not made of
assumptions
and possible
biases.
Writing does
not synthesize
the classroom
experiences
and content;
nor analyzes
patterns or
connections
between
theory and
practice.
Logical
conclusions
based on wellreasoned
arguments are
not exhibited. Does not meet
minimal
standards. Did not
submit
element. Element 5:
Written
Delivery Style
& Grammar 10 (10%) 9.5 (9.5%) 8.5 (8.5%) 7.5 (7.5%) 5 (5%) 0 (0%) Student
consistently
follows APA
writing style
and basic
rules of formal
English
grammar and
written essay
style. Student
communicates
in a cohesive,
logical style.
There are no
spelling or
grammar
errors. Student
consistently
follows APA
writing style
and basic
rules of formal
English
grammar and
written essay
style. Student
communicates
in a cohesive,
logical style.
There are one
or two minor
errors in
spelling or
grammar. Student
mostly follows
APA writing
style and
basic rules of
formal English
grammar and
written essay
style. Student
mostly
communicates
in a cohesive,
logical style.
There are
some errors in
spelling or
grammar. Student does
not follow APA
writing style
and basic
rules of formal
English
grammar and
written essay
style and does
not
communicate
in a cohesive,
logical style. Does not meet
minimal
standards. Did not
submit
element. https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16286201_1&rubric_id=_131946_1 3/4 8/12/2017 Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn Element 6:
Formal and
Appropriate
Documentation
of Evidence,
Attribution of
Ideas (APA
Citations) Superior
Criteria Excellent
Criteria Satisfactory
Criteria Marginal
Criteria Unsatisfactory
Criteria Not
Submitted 10 (10%) 9.5 (9.5%) 8.5 (8.5%) 7.5 (7.5%) 5 (5%) 0 (0%) Student
demonstrates
full adherence
to scholarly
reference
requirements
and adheres
to APA style
with respect to
source
attribution,
references,
heading and
subheading
logic, table of
contents and
lists of charts,
etc. There are
no APA errors. Student
demonstrates
full adherence
to scholarly
reference
requirements
and adheres
to APA style
with respect to
source
attribution,
references,
heading and
subheading
logic, table of
contents and
lists of charts,
etc. There are
one or two
minor errors in
APA style or
format. Student
mostly
adheres to
scholarly
reference
requirements
and/or mostly
adheres to
APA style with
respect to
source
attribution,
references,
heading and
subheading
logic, table of
contents and
lists of charts,
etc. Some
errors in APA
format and
style are
evident. Student
demonstrates
weak or
inconsistent
adherence
scholarly
reference
requirements
and/or weak
or inconsistent
adherence to
APA style with
respect to
source
attribution,
references,
heading and
subheading
logic, table of
contents and
lists of charts,
etc. Several
errors in APA
format and
style are
evident. Does not meet
minimal
standards. Did not
submit
element. Name: DDBA_8151_Week_6_Assignment_Rubric Exit https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16286201_1&rubric_id=_131946_1 4/4
Categories: