Length: 2000 words
Format: Report Format
Task Required:-The aim of this assignment
is to allow participants to explore and develop key capabilities in one of the
two key managing others capabilities addressed in the course.
1.
Students are to choose either: – select 0ne topic from these three
Conflict and Negotiation, or
Empathy and Trust, or
Teams and Groups.
Students
are then to prepare a literature review about the chosen topic that defines the
key terms and outlines key theories or models and application (1000 words
Approx).
2.diagnostic
tools:-Students must utilise at least three (3)
of the diagnostic tools undertaken during the workshops (such as the Johari
Window, Thomas Khilman Conflict Questionnaire, The Big 5, ESCI, Belbin Team
Inventory etc.) that provide insights into current capabilities or preferences.
Students are to contrast the results of
the diagnostics tests and compare these to the literature so as to identify key
strengths and weakness in their managing others capabilities (500 words
Approx).
Please note: – I already done those three conflict
questionnaires, I will forward those results about my personality and
capabilities within 1 day to your account.
3. Development
plan: – Students are then to identify two areas for improvement. Using your
learnings from the literature review and diagnostic tools, develop a realistic
plan of activities designed to improve your knowledge and skills over a 6 month
period (500 words Approx.).
I am thinking human resources & employment relations
courses are more suitable for these topic so please consider these two.
ASSESEMENT CRITERIA:-
Ø Ability to construct a detailed and cohesive literature
review that defines key concepts and terms related to the selected
competency/capability
Ø As part of the literature review to summarise and
contrast key concepts/models related to the selected competency/capability
Ø Provide the results of 3 diagnostic tools that relate
to the selected competency and to analyse these against the literature to identify
personal strengths and weaknesses
Ø Ability to devise a personal (management) development
plan, supported by literature, that addresses these key capability needs
Ø Demonstrate a breadth and quality of research by using
a minimum of 12 academic sources from recommended texts and Journal articles
Ø Use of the Harvard in text referencing system to
correctly cite academic sources
Marking
criteria & additional information about word limit for each task:-
|
Section |
Description |
Additional Information |
Value |
|
Introduction |
Brief statement that clearly identified the Approximately 100-150 words |
No additional information statement, |
2 marks |
|
Capability Topic |
Contrasting of several definitions of the Identification of the key competency Approximately 800-1000 words |
Students should demonstrate wide reading |
8marks |
|
Research Associated with the Capability |
A minimum of 12 scholarly references, with A full reference list at the end of the |
Students who have less than 12 references Students who meet the minimum references To obtain the full 6 marks, students need |
6marks |
|
Self Analysis of Capability |
Using the results of the diagnostic testsStudents are to reflect on the Approximately 500 words |
Students should cite at least 2 brief |
4marks |
|
Diagnostic Tools |
Students in MGMT 20124 need to undertake a minimum Both groups must include at least 3 results |
Students who do not include at least 3 The results sheets should be attached as |
4marks |
|
Development Plan |
Students need to specify at least 3 Approximately 500 words |
Students can identify up to two Masters electives Other activities can include short courses, |
4 marks |
|
Conclusion |
Brief statement that outlines the major |
Statement to include observation about the |
2 marks |
