Do you agree with the court that there is no “func- tional difference” between the three tests—the “com- mon law agency” test, the “economic realities” test, and the “common law hybrid”—test for whether someone is an employee or an independent contractor?
2.Even if it might not be vital in this situation, could you imagine a circumstance where the distinction could be great and a different decision would result under one or several of these tests
3.What is the value in the court’s decision in reaching convergence among the three tests in Murray?
Categories: