Week 6
Assignment: Draft Qualitative Prospectus
Week 6
Discussion: Alignment Within Qualitative Studies
——————————————————————-
DDBA 8300
Week 6 Assignment Draft Qualitative Prospectus
To prepare for this Assignment, review pages
13–16 in the DBA Doctoral Study Prospectus Guide, as well as Sections 1.4, 1.8,
1.9, and 1.10 of the Doctoral Study Rubric and Research Handbook for details on
requirements for a Problem Statement, Purpose Statement, Nature of the Study,
Research Question(s), Interview Questions, and Conceptual Framework for a qualitative
study.
Submit a draft qualitative Doctoral
Study Prospectus that includes the following:
·
Problem
Statement (not to exceed 150 words)
·
Purpose
Statement (not to exceed 200 words)
·
Nature
of the Study (not to exceed 1 page)
·
Research
Question(s) (20 words max per item) and Interview Questions (may include up to
6 to 10 questions depending on the type of study)
·
Conceptual
Framework (not to exceed 1 page)
·
References
page
Please
refer to the DBA Doctoral Study Prospectus Guide and the Doctoral Study Rubric
and Research Handbook for more specific information about the
length/requirements for each component in the Doctoral Study Prospectus.
DDBA8300
Week 6 Discussion Alignment Within Qualitative Studies
Post
an assessment of your chosen qualitative study utilized in Week 2. Your
assessment should include the following:
·
Briefly describe key components of your
chosen article: problem statement, purpose statement, conceptual framework,
research question(s), and interview questions. (Note: You will attach a copy of
this study to your Discussion post.)
·
Analyze the alignment between these
components, including areas of misalignment.
o
Explain the level of alignment between
these specific components, including areas that may be lacking.
o
Recommend at least one change that could
improve alignment within this study, including a rationale for your
recommendation.
Be sure to support your work with a minimum of two specific citations
from this week’s Learning Resources and at least one additional scholarly
source.
