Questions and Answers 2
1. Determine the fundamental ways in which the NCAA’s ethics program failed to prevent
the scandals at Penn State, Ohio State, and the University of Arkansas. Support your
response with one (1) example from each of these schools’ scandals.
There were various reasons due to which NCAA’s ethical program get failed to prevent
the scandals at Penn State, Ohio State, and the University of Arkansas. I think, this thought is not
about Penn State or University of Arkansas, but also I would like to say that if there are issues
with our people whom are running a system or program then NCAA’s or other institution
couldn’t control over the situation. NCAA’s could allow the ethical policies in order to maintain
the ethics in our Universities but if Universities staff will do wrong then what the NCAA or other
institution could do instead of one option i.e. inspection or audit but it was not mention under
the NCAA’s ethical policies, NCAA (2014, November).
Here, I am explaining the situation with example that considered after FBI investigation;
within this report, it was mention that NCAA (2014, November), “four men failed to act despite
having opportunities to confront. They displayed “totally disregard” for children whom being
victimized by Sandusky, and Paterno, whom Freeh repeatedly portrayed as the group’s most
powerful figure during a news conference. They lied about what they knew, when they knew it
and, according to e-mail correspondence, they intended against a plan, not to follow NCAA’s
provided ethical policies.”
However, somehow there were few mistakes which were mapped by NCAA’s executives as
follows, NCAA (2014, November); They didn’t managed any inspection or audit in order to verify that Universities of
Colleges have been following the ethical policies in regard of child safety and education. Questions and Answers 3 There were less awareness to children about such ethical practices; so that they could
come front to complain against any disputes. NCAA’s with policies doesn’t include Ethical Code of Conduct with considerable laws
and regulations in order to know the culprit, the impact of such brutal crime. Lacking in NCAA’s leadership as there were many leadership which were associated with
NCAA’s plan but still they didn’t do anything in order to prevent any anticipated crime. 2. Examine the principal ways in which the leadership of the NCAA contributed to the
ethical violations of Penn State, Ohio State, and the University of Arkansas. Support your
response with one (1) example from each of these schools’ scandals.
Again the same thing I could say, there were leaders whom were well-aware even after
applying the ethical policies in institutions or universities, ‘there are many people whom would
do such crime against children. But such leaders didn’t even cross check any ethical policies
violation, they only send ethical policies document to every institution and didn’t check; are they
applied or not; how universities treating with such ethical regulations, is there any benefits with
such policies, no decision-making process, etc.
Additionally as I discussed above, The NCAA’s 444-page manual contained no language
directly addressing appropriate punishment for concealing information regarding child sexual
abuse. It was a shameful conduct of Penn State’s leadership, whom revealed Thursday in Freeh
report, the NCAA must have used its authority to do what was needed instead of shut down the
Nittany Lions football program, NCAA (2002, November). Questions and Answers 4 Freeh reported about poor leadership of NCAA’s as; “Freeh determined the officials’
unintelligibly took poor decisions which stemmed from their desire to avoid negative publicity
that could damage the school and the program. Penn State’s “culture of reverence for the
football program” led it’s most senior leaders to put protecting the program ahead of protecting
underprivileged boys, many of whom lacked father figures, from a child rapist.” 3. Predict the key differences in the scenarios that occurred at Penn State, Ohio State, and
the University of Arkansas if an effective ethics program was in place. Provide a rationale
for your response.
Both the concerns expected relate to NCAA’s ethical regulations and both had violated
regulations of ethical practices. However, there were few differences which were observed
within these states or universities as, NCAA (2002, November);
Penn State Concerned Scenario
This was the scenario of PSU’s ‘over-reaction’ University of Arkansas Concerned Scenario on football game, the players and students Pine Bluff. 2 The institution as well as didn’t deserve to lose the football team over enforcement staff are only parties in this case. this. This case involves the University of Arkansas at There were six-member panel of the committee
initially considered this case through the
cooperative summary disposition process in
which all the parties agreed to primary facts,
violations and violation levels, as fully set forth
in the summary disposition report. Found all the members involved in Child This case was something about the internal violation. ethical concerns which were associated with
everyone whom relate to game but everyone Questions and Answers 5 Leadership wasn’t there with Penn State, to was not guilty.
There was people didn’t aware the impact of introduced such unethical practices unethical practices. 4. Postulate on two (2) actions that the NCAA leadership should take in order to regain the
trust and confidence of students and stakeholders.
NCAA’s Leadership must consider the below ethical regulations in order to prevent such
situations couldn’t arise in future as follows, The Ethics of Care (2005);
Here, I am introducing few ethical code of conduct that must be initiated by leader to
maintain the moral values of institutions;
People Treat stakeholders with respect and dignity. Welcome diversity and diverse opinions for global institutional education approach. Provide assistance to junior and trainees so that they could be able to do their task
effectively. Motivational recognition of talent and reward accomplishment for students. Effective teamwork and collaboration by institutional members. Efficient Management with Integrity Be honest, forthright and trustworthy. Use straight talk; no hidden agendas of the institution. Respect ethics, rules and regulation. Commitment towards work Questions and Answers Honor commitments to clients, shareholders, and each other. Accept personal responsibility to meet the institutional commitments; be accountable. Excellence Continuously improve the performance factors. Stress productivity, quality, growth, best business practices and measurements. Always attempt for the best
the scandals at Penn State, Ohio State, and the University of Arkansas. Support your
response with one (1) example from each of these schools’ scandals.
There were various reasons due to which NCAA’s ethical program get failed to prevent
the scandals at Penn State, Ohio State, and the University of Arkansas. I think, this thought is not
about Penn State or University of Arkansas, but also I would like to say that if there are issues
with our people whom are running a system or program then NCAA’s or other institution
couldn’t control over the situation. NCAA’s could allow the ethical policies in order to maintain
the ethics in our Universities but if Universities staff will do wrong then what the NCAA or other
institution could do instead of one option i.e. inspection or audit but it was not mention under
the NCAA’s ethical policies, NCAA (2014, November).
Here, I am explaining the situation with example that considered after FBI investigation;
within this report, it was mention that NCAA (2014, November), “four men failed to act despite
having opportunities to confront. They displayed “totally disregard” for children whom being
victimized by Sandusky, and Paterno, whom Freeh repeatedly portrayed as the group’s most
powerful figure during a news conference. They lied about what they knew, when they knew it
and, according to e-mail correspondence, they intended against a plan, not to follow NCAA’s
provided ethical policies.”
However, somehow there were few mistakes which were mapped by NCAA’s executives as
follows, NCAA (2014, November); They didn’t managed any inspection or audit in order to verify that Universities of
Colleges have been following the ethical policies in regard of child safety and education. Questions and Answers 3 There were less awareness to children about such ethical practices; so that they could
come front to complain against any disputes. NCAA’s with policies doesn’t include Ethical Code of Conduct with considerable laws
and regulations in order to know the culprit, the impact of such brutal crime. Lacking in NCAA’s leadership as there were many leadership which were associated with
NCAA’s plan but still they didn’t do anything in order to prevent any anticipated crime. 2. Examine the principal ways in which the leadership of the NCAA contributed to the
ethical violations of Penn State, Ohio State, and the University of Arkansas. Support your
response with one (1) example from each of these schools’ scandals.
Again the same thing I could say, there were leaders whom were well-aware even after
applying the ethical policies in institutions or universities, ‘there are many people whom would
do such crime against children. But such leaders didn’t even cross check any ethical policies
violation, they only send ethical policies document to every institution and didn’t check; are they
applied or not; how universities treating with such ethical regulations, is there any benefits with
such policies, no decision-making process, etc.
Additionally as I discussed above, The NCAA’s 444-page manual contained no language
directly addressing appropriate punishment for concealing information regarding child sexual
abuse. It was a shameful conduct of Penn State’s leadership, whom revealed Thursday in Freeh
report, the NCAA must have used its authority to do what was needed instead of shut down the
Nittany Lions football program, NCAA (2002, November). Questions and Answers 4 Freeh reported about poor leadership of NCAA’s as; “Freeh determined the officials’
unintelligibly took poor decisions which stemmed from their desire to avoid negative publicity
that could damage the school and the program. Penn State’s “culture of reverence for the
football program” led it’s most senior leaders to put protecting the program ahead of protecting
underprivileged boys, many of whom lacked father figures, from a child rapist.” 3. Predict the key differences in the scenarios that occurred at Penn State, Ohio State, and
the University of Arkansas if an effective ethics program was in place. Provide a rationale
for your response.
Both the concerns expected relate to NCAA’s ethical regulations and both had violated
regulations of ethical practices. However, there were few differences which were observed
within these states or universities as, NCAA (2002, November);
Penn State Concerned Scenario
This was the scenario of PSU’s ‘over-reaction’ University of Arkansas Concerned Scenario on football game, the players and students Pine Bluff. 2 The institution as well as didn’t deserve to lose the football team over enforcement staff are only parties in this case. this. This case involves the University of Arkansas at There were six-member panel of the committee
initially considered this case through the
cooperative summary disposition process in
which all the parties agreed to primary facts,
violations and violation levels, as fully set forth
in the summary disposition report. Found all the members involved in Child This case was something about the internal violation. ethical concerns which were associated with
everyone whom relate to game but everyone Questions and Answers 5 Leadership wasn’t there with Penn State, to was not guilty.
There was people didn’t aware the impact of introduced such unethical practices unethical practices. 4. Postulate on two (2) actions that the NCAA leadership should take in order to regain the
trust and confidence of students and stakeholders.
NCAA’s Leadership must consider the below ethical regulations in order to prevent such
situations couldn’t arise in future as follows, The Ethics of Care (2005);
Here, I am introducing few ethical code of conduct that must be initiated by leader to
maintain the moral values of institutions;
People Treat stakeholders with respect and dignity. Welcome diversity and diverse opinions for global institutional education approach. Provide assistance to junior and trainees so that they could be able to do their task
effectively. Motivational recognition of talent and reward accomplishment for students. Effective teamwork and collaboration by institutional members. Efficient Management with Integrity Be honest, forthright and trustworthy. Use straight talk; no hidden agendas of the institution. Respect ethics, rules and regulation. Commitment towards work Questions and Answers Honor commitments to clients, shareholders, and each other. Accept personal responsibility to meet the institutional commitments; be accountable. Excellence Continuously improve the performance factors. Stress productivity, quality, growth, best business practices and measurements. Always attempt for the best
Categories: